SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO OTTAWA WITNESS GROUP MUNICIPAL ELECTION QUESTIONNAIRE 2003
The following is a capsule version of the replies to the questionnaire. Please click on the candidate name links to see their full statements.
M
|
NAME |
Define role of PSB | Seek appt to PSB |
Why suitable |
PSB improved public trust |
Major events policing policies/updates needed |
Post PSB minutes |
Separate PSB Web site |
1a | 1b | 1c | 2 | 3 | 4a | 4b | ||
M
|
J. Bell | Ö | N | Some trust | None | No | ||
5
|
D. Craig | Ö | Y | Police officer
31 years |
Good process | None | Yes | Yes |
7
|
A. Cullen | Ö | N | Trust unchanged | PSB should open public dialogue on meshing free speech and public safety | Yes | Not necessary | |
12
|
N. Duckworth | Ö | Y | Aims to improve police-community relations | No, public trust still strained | PSB should have police meet/set up cooperation with demonstrator groups | Yes, if meetings public | No |
4
|
P. Feltmate | Ö | N | Public unaware of PSB, room to improve | Use MELT to build trust between event organizers and police | Minutes are posted | No | |
4
|
G. Johnston | Ö | Y | Fair-minded | Yes, effective oversight but improve evaluation of police chief | Policies should decrease tension with peaceful protesters | Minutes are posted | |
M
|
T. Kilrea | No oversight role | Y | Law and order, supports police | Should be no civilian oversight | PSB should let police do their job | Yes | |
15
|
K. Klein | Ö | Y | Lawyer, aims to protect public interest | Yes, but would like more consultation | Need to consult to find out the problems | Yes | |
4
|
D. Leafloor | N | Don’t know | Yes | ||||
19
|
G. Lowe | Ö | Y | Wants to become police officer | None | Yes | ||
6
|
M. O’Rourke | Ö | N | Reasonable level of oversight | Maintain training in crowd control | Yes, for non-confidential business | No | |
14
|
D. Pickering | Ö | Y | Open-minded, accessible to citizens | Some trust but low public profile | PSB to ensure level of policing and citizens to work with the police | Yes | |
12
|
A. Rickman | Y | Experienced in justice issues | Uncertain: little PSB transparency, limited communication | PSB should focus on improving public respect for free speech | Yes | ||
14
|
S. Sweeney | Ö | Y | Fairness, wants transparency | No lack of trust | Don’t know | Yes | No |
SUMMARY OF RESPONSES - PART 2
MorW |
NAME |
Improved policing of major events |
Changes needed |
Role of PSB in improving |
Your contribution |
Need independent complaints review process | Allow third party complaints |
5a | 5b | 5c | 5d | 6a | 6b | ||
M
|
J. Bell | Exemplary, no change needed | Yes, but witnesses must be investigated | ||||
5
|
D. Craig | Yes, police gather and use intelligence | PSB should help with decisions at major events and cooperation with other forces | Would try to keep PSB transparent | Yes, every decision should be able to be appealed | Yes | |
7
|
A. Cullen | Yes | More dialogue with the public | PSB needs to initiate this dialogue | Would urge the PSB to begin the dialogue | Need mechanism for independent review of police complaints | Need mechanism to deal with third party complaints |
12
|
N. Duckworth | Yes, but can go further | Better prepare officers, sensitivity training | PSB should take proactive steps to improve policing | Would work with community groups, public and police | Yes, would work for Ontario government to have arm’s length organization investigate complaints | Undecided |
4
|
P. Feltmate | Don’t know | Don’t know | Encourage police to work with protest organizers | Yes, but it is provincial responsibility | ||
4
|
G. Johnston | Yes | PSB should look at other places for ideas to improve | Would encourage the PSB as in (c) | Yes, if fair and reasonable | Yes, but use polygraphs to confirm validity | |
M
|
T. Kilrea | PSB should just ensure police have tools for the job | Provincial responsibility | Provincial responsibility | |||
15
|
K. Klein | Need to consult | Need to consult | PSB mandate is appropriate | Would bring legal background, critical eye and commitment | PSB should remain independent | Yes |
4
|
D. Leafloor | Don’t know | |||||
19
|
G. Lowe | Yes | Current role sufficient | Would take appointment to PSB seriously | Would consider it to raise public confidence | ||
6
|
M. O’Rourke | Yes, commendable | Continue to monitor and train in crowd control | Fulfil its mandate | Would work to ensure compliance with guidelines and release information | Avenues are available; provincial responsibility | |
14
|
D. Pickering | Yes | PSB to uphold its AFX | Would ensure decisions based on facts to meet security and freedom goals | Yes | Yes | |
12
|
A. Rickman | Not enough | Stop preemptive arrests | PSB should mediate between protesters, community, police | Understanding of civil concerns would broaden community relations discussions | Yes | Yes |
14
|
S. Sweeney | Don’t know | Yes, need independent body for investigation oversight | Yes, but increase penalties for frivolous complaints and have PSB decide on these |
SUMMARY OF RESPONSES - PART 3
MorW |
NAME |
5% of complaints valid | Support improved complaint process | Publicize pepper spray/taser guidelines | Eliminate use of pepper spray/tasers | Media sensationalize protests | How Council can help |
7a | 7b | 8a | 8b | 9a | 9b | ||
M
|
J. Bell | No reason to believe otherwise | No, guidelines are in place for use | An individual decision whether sensationalized | |||
5
|
D. Craig | Yes, many complaints are to deflect charges | No, police should not give information to the bad guys | No, these are better than the alternatives | Yes, all are put in a bad light | Police could let the public view video; City or PSB could shoot own video | |
7
|
A. Cullen | Hard to believe | Yes | Yes | Need to set reasonable limits on use | Yes, from time to time | Provide venues for expression of dissent |
12
|
N. Duckworth | No | Yes | Yes | Would review policy with constituents; elimination may not be necessary | Yes, but not intentionally downplaying value of free speech | Not council’s role, but promote the Charter of Rights and Freedoms |
4
|
P. Feltmate | Need to see the evidence, but shows need for independent review process | Yes | Yes | Councilors can help by working with peaceful protesters | ||
4
|
G. Johnston | Can’t say, but would want officers to take polygraph too | Yes | No, unless police receive safer tools | Yes | PSB/politicians to make public the facts of the situation | |
M
|
T. Kilrea | Yes | No | No, police need these tools | No, police need these tools | The media are doing their job | No role for City Council |
15
|
K. Klein | Yes, until data is reviewed | Yes, unless it would put officers at risk | No, better than guns, just use safely | Base decisions on facts, not media reports | ||
4
|
D. Leafloor | Don’t know | Don’t know | ||||
19
|
G. Lowe | Probably not accurate | Would look at independent approach | Yes | No | Yes | Council can’t do much |
6
|
M. O’Rourke | Yes | Yes, unless it would put officers at risk | No | No | Council doesn’t control media | |
14
|
D. Pickering | Must see data | Yes | Media sensationalize but don’t downplay value of free speech | |||
12
|
A. Rickman | Need to see data | Need independent body to evaluate and investigate complaints | Yes | Would support finding alternatives | Yes | Council could provide safe space to protest and work with both sides |
14
|
S. Sweeney | Yes, some people want to deflect charges | Would support effective, open process | No, would help criminals;complaintprocess will catch misapplications of force | No, better than alternative, but must be used properly | Yes, but free speech is endangered by the violent protesters |
SUMMARY OF RESPONSES - PART 4
MorW |
NAME |
Okay for police to videotape | PSB to discourage videotaping | Require destruction of unused videotape | Set deadline to make AFX into policy | Support increased use of MELT | Support permanent positions for MELT |
10a | 10b | 11 | 12 | 13a | 13b | ||
M
|
J. Bell | Police gathering evidence against criminals, no interest in the innocent | Yes | Yes | Yes, policing is a priority for me | ||
5
|
D. Craig | Good idea; anyone can tape events | Yes | Yes | Yes | Try to get money from the province | |
7
|
A. Cullen | Ban videotaping of lawful events | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
12
|
N. Duckworth | Undecided; protesters should not hide; don’t use for profiling | Yes | Yes | Yes | Need to review funding process | |
4
|
P. Feltmate | Sometimes, but need guidelines so not used to harass | Need guidelines on use | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
4
|
G. Johnston | Yes,for i.d./proof but destroy if not useful | No, okay if used properly | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
M
|
T. Kilrea | If in a public place, police are justified | Absolutely not | No, don’t tie hands of police, can’t work from a script | No | No | |
15
|
K. Klein | Only where clearly appropriate | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
4
|
D. Leafloor | All sides should be videotaped | Don’t know | ||||
19
|
G. Lowe | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Should not have own budget | |
6
|
M. O’Rourke | Not unreasonable | Yes, as determined by PSB | Haven’t seen AFX | Yes, if decided after operational review | If (a), yes | |
14
|
D. Pickering | Helps PSB review complaints | Yes | Yes | Yes | Would be based on Program Review | |
12
|
A. Rickman | No, rights violation and intimidation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes, strengthening credibility of police is good investment |
14
|
S. Sweeney | No problem, it’s a public place | No incentive for police to retain if not useful | Not familiar with AFX | Yes | City’s financial issues might prevent this |